Thread: BBBJ compared protected anal sex
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 16-12-2008, 01:03 PM
freethinker freethinker is offline
Samster
  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 9 / Power: 0
freethinker is Cool - loads of Potential
Re: BBBJ compared protected anal sex
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut123 View Post
Your question is rather silly. If the condom does not break, then of coz anal is safer since there is no fluid exchange. BBBJ carries a moderate risk of STDs since you are not protected.

Preference is of course a purely personal choice. I prefer BJ to Anal. Anal is disgusting to me, but this is purely subjective. To me, putting your dick into an anus is like putting your dick into a toilet bowl. Besides, I'm sure its pretty painful for the girl. Why the hell would I want to cause her pain ? And... the chances of the condom breaking is higher than vaginal sex, since the ass is usually tighter.

Lastly, one of the good things about BJs is that theres alot of variety, in that her lips and tongue can do wonders that a hole can't :-) Again, its purely personal preference.
Yeah, you are right.

Any idea what are the chances of condom breakage during anal versus BBBJ causing HIV?

I am just wondering if condom breakage is also quite low percentage, why do most FLs do not provide anal but just BBBJ.