Quote:
Originally Posted by kuasimi
The issue here is not whether boy is guilty or not. This is only for the Judge and legal process to decide.
The issue is whether how the school and SPF handled the boy was right or wrong.
Why was the boy who was a minor interrogated alone without parents or lawyers present?
What happened during police interrogation? Was the boy coerce or ill-treated to a point his mental state became abnormal?
Why did the school allow the boy to be arrested in the middle of the school time, embarassing the boy in front of his peers and subsequently proclaim the boy guilty by disallowed him to go to the school camp?
The entire process had more wrongs than rights.
|
Once again your posts epic fail.
Where's your cb analysis? Where!!!
The police set up Benjamin.
It's a non seizable offence. I bet there's no warrant.
So they go to school to catch cos parents not there.
And the school failed Benjamin.
The principal blindly follow authority. Never think.
Where's his responsibility for Benjamin?
If the principal told the 5 cops he's responsible for Benjamin at school n ask them to produce warrant, they lppl. They won't expect it
And if he called Benjamins parents down, the police will lose their advantage. And its unlikely theyll tekan Benjamin for 3 hours if parents waiting outside n with support, its unlikely he will kill himself later.
The principal should just resign.
He just gave away children under his charge when ppl ask.
This is similar to those principals giving away their children when authorities came to take them away to work overseas for their poor families.
What's the work you ask? Comfort women.
What did this principal do?
He told Benjamin to eat his bread before sending him to his eventual doom n death. This guy will be judged when he dies.